Hello Tamiko,
Congratulations on your piece. I was wondering if you were aware of this
site that uses Flash to look at similar issues to your piece:
Face to Face: Stories from the Aftermath of Infamy
http://www.itvs.org/facetoface/intro.html
Here's the blurb:
"In the wake of 9/11, many Muslims around the United States faced a
backlash of resentment and anger. This groundswell of emotion was not
without parallel, as Japanese and Japanese-Americans faced a similar
reaction after the bombing of Pearl Harbor in 1941. The Independent
Television Service has developed this Web site to bring a human face to
the experiences of Muslims and Japanese people in the United States by
collecting these powerful interviews from members of both groups. On the
site, visitors can listen to stories from older Japanese-Americans talk
about their experiences on the West Coast after Pearl Harbor, and the
experiences of Muslims, both young and old. The interviews are divided
into thematic sections, such as "Fear," "Internment," "Identity," and
"Being American." At another section of the site, visitors can respond
to the stories, and a glossary of terms is also provided as background
material."
As this is dealing with very similar subject matter, I thought it might
be good way of the list looking at the differences between Web2D and
Web3D. Would you feel like elucidating what properties you feel that 3D
brings to the work and why you prefer to work in this medium? Whilst
I've only seen the web version of your piece, I imagine its the
difference between 'experience' and 'being told'? Whilst I note that you
use the term 'virtual reality', I don't imagine that your aim is for the
beholders to actually think they are experiencing it, rather to provide
a deeper, more experiential, insight into what it must have been like to
experience that reality? I ask this because I am very interested in
Web3D artists trying to develop an appropriate vocabulary, rather than
one that is based on precedents (usually cinematic or early-90s hokum).
As an example, I love the idea of 'immersion', but recently this word
has taken on a very narrow definition that means the kind of Imax or
CAVE type environment that attempts an actual physical immersion,
whereas (as much as I enjoy Imax movies) I find reading a novel to be
far more immersive. Similarly, what is the verb that we use for
beholding a Web3D piece? The verb 'seeing' is inadequate. Perhaps
'experiencing' is more appropriate. By identifying the qualities that
set Web3D apart from Flash and other 2D tech's, perhaps we can start
working towards an appropriate vocabulary.
I'd be most interested to hear your views, as well as those of the other
guests this month.
Regards,
Adam
________________________________
Adam Nash
adam@yamanakanash.net
1/360 Carlisle St, Balaclava, Vic, 3183
0412185008